more confessions of an inglorious bastard

Lost in the snowy wilderness of South Lake Tahoe, Ray finds himself far from the comforts of civilization in his latest misadventure. From bewildering encounters with local wildlife to nostalgic reflections on past escapades, Ray's solo journey is as chaotic as it is comical. Watch as he navigates the beautiful yet unforgiving terrain, wrestling with nature and his own quirks, all while delivering his trademark blend of humor and unexpected wisdom. Will Ray find his way back, or is he too entranced by the eccentricities of Tahoe life to even care? Join him in this bizarre trek through the snow, where not all who wander are lost—they're just on another level of misadventure.

Behind the Scenes

More Confessions of an Inglorious Bastard is less a sequel than a continuation of a method. By this point, the original Confessions had already abandoned its documentary premise in favor of something looser, stranger, and more self-aware. The follow-up doesn’t attempt to correct that course. It doubles down on it.

If the first film was a documentary that broke apart in the edit, More Confessions is what happens when you start with no structure at all. “We just went into the woods and filmed whatever,” Ray explains in commentary, describing a process that had by then become second nature.

The shift is immediate.

Where the first film still carries traces of intention, interviews, setups, a vague sense that something is being documented, the second abandons even that pretense. Scenes are not constructed so much as discovered. Locations are chosen for their availability rather than meaning. The camera follows behavior instead of directing it.

At times, even the participants seem unsure what the film is supposed to be. “I don’t think most of this stuff was… planned,” Ray admits during the track, trailing off as the footage continues. That uncertainty becomes the point.

Ray’s on-screen persona also shifts, subtly but noticeably. In the original Confessions, the character exists somewhere between exaggerated ego and constructed performance. Here, the line collapses further. “I guess we’ve established that this character isn’t Revolver,” Ray notes. “It’s Ray Revello.”

The mythology gives way to something closer to self-parody, or possibly just self. Catchphrases emerge organically, most notably a repeated outburst directed at unseen intruders: “Get out of my Tahoe!”

The film also reflects a subtle change in the group itself. During the commentary, there is a recurring awareness that something has already been lost. A tone that used to come naturally now feels distant, harder to access. “We don’t do this anymore,” Ray observes at one point, referring not just to the filming process, but to the mindset behind it. The conversation circles around possible reasons. Time, age, relationships. One explanation lands with more weight than the others. “I think a certain woman did this.” It’s half a joke. Not entirely.

Stylistically, the film continues to absorb influences without filtering them. Horror elements begin to creep in, reflecting Ray’s growing interest in the genre. References to vampires, Bigfoot, and improvised thriller scenarios appear briefly, then disappear just as quickly. None of them develop into full ideas. All of them leave traces. Elsewhere, the film revisits earlier material, creating loose callbacks to the original Confessions while introducing fragments of new ideas that would never fully resolve.

What remains most consistent is the approach. There are no rules. No clear endpoint. No distinction between a good idea and a usable one. “If something happens, we film it,” is the unspoken logic. And if nothing happens, you wait until it does. Or pretend that it did. Viewed in isolation, More Confessions of an Inglorious Bastard is disjointed, uneven, and often difficult to categorize. Viewed in context, it represents a progression.

The group is no longer trying to imitate anything. They are no longer pretending to be making something conventional. They are beginning to understand that the camera can simply follow them, and that whatever they do in front of it, intentional or not, can become the film. Whether that’s a strength or a problem isn’t something they attempt to answer. They just keep going.

Previous
Previous

#10. Ray Vs. Donald (2004)

Next
Next

#8. Rich & Lozo (2004)